Vancouver's social housing initiative

Share Vancouver's social housing initiative on Facebook Share Vancouver's social housing initiative on Twitter Share Vancouver's social housing initiative on Linkedin Email Vancouver's social housing initiative link
Image of illustrative city with mix of buildings, people, and streetscape

Making Vancouver more inclusive and equitable is a key priority of Vancouver Plan, the city’s long-term land-use strategy. Vancouver’s Social Housing Initiative works toward the critical need for affordable housing by simplifying and changing zoning regulations to allow for mixed-income social, supportive, and co-operative housing to be built without a rezoning in all Vancouver neighbourhoods.

Taking direction from Vancouver Plan’s approved land use vision, this initiative would permit non-profit and government organizations to build social housing buildings from 6 to 18 storeys, depending on neighbourhood type, with a focus on areas close to transit and commercial centres. New buildings will have the opportunity to include local serving retail and childcare alongside social housing.

These proposed changes would allow social housing projects to be built faster with less cost, giving priority to providing homes for people who need them most and working toward maintaining diversity in the city.

How to get involved:

Here are some ways you can learn more and share your thoughts:

  • Learn more about the proposal in a brief summary (PDF, 1.6MB)
  • Read the full proposal details (PDF, 89 MB)
  • Ask questions about the initiative
  • Share your comments on the initiative until Tuesday, October 22
  • Come to one of the in-person or virtual public information sessions:
    1. Tuesday, October 1, 4:30-7:30 pm, Seniors Centre Multipurpose Room, Kerrisdale Community Centre (5851 West Boulevard)
    2. Wednesday, October 2, 6-7:30 pm *Virtual Information Session* (register here )
    3. Thursday, October 3, 4:30-7:30 pm, Room A, Croatian Cultural Centre (3250 Commercial Drive)
    4. Tuesday, October 8, 6:00-7:30 pm *Virtual Information Session* (register here)

Next steps:

Public engagement is open until Tuesday October 22. Next, we will be compiling feedback and finalizing the proposal, before providing a public update in Q1 2025 and bringing the proposal to City Council for a decision in late Q2 2025.

Making Vancouver more inclusive and equitable is a key priority of Vancouver Plan, the city’s long-term land-use strategy. Vancouver’s Social Housing Initiative works toward the critical need for affordable housing by simplifying and changing zoning regulations to allow for mixed-income social, supportive, and co-operative housing to be built without a rezoning in all Vancouver neighbourhoods.

Taking direction from Vancouver Plan’s approved land use vision, this initiative would permit non-profit and government organizations to build social housing buildings from 6 to 18 storeys, depending on neighbourhood type, with a focus on areas close to transit and commercial centres. New buildings will have the opportunity to include local serving retail and childcare alongside social housing.

These proposed changes would allow social housing projects to be built faster with less cost, giving priority to providing homes for people who need them most and working toward maintaining diversity in the city.

How to get involved:

Here are some ways you can learn more and share your thoughts:

  • Learn more about the proposal in a brief summary (PDF, 1.6MB)
  • Read the full proposal details (PDF, 89 MB)
  • Ask questions about the initiative
  • Share your comments on the initiative until Tuesday, October 22
  • Come to one of the in-person or virtual public information sessions:
    1. Tuesday, October 1, 4:30-7:30 pm, Seniors Centre Multipurpose Room, Kerrisdale Community Centre (5851 West Boulevard)
    2. Wednesday, October 2, 6-7:30 pm *Virtual Information Session* (register here )
    3. Thursday, October 3, 4:30-7:30 pm, Room A, Croatian Cultural Centre (3250 Commercial Drive)
    4. Tuesday, October 8, 6:00-7:30 pm *Virtual Information Session* (register here)

Next steps:

Public engagement is open until Tuesday October 22. Next, we will be compiling feedback and finalizing the proposal, before providing a public update in Q1 2025 and bringing the proposal to City Council for a decision in late Q2 2025.

Ask a question

Do you have a question about Vancouver’s Social Housing Initiative?

We would like to hear from you as we finalize the proposal. We will use this page to provide project updates and ask for your comments on the proposal. Please note, City staff will aim to provide a response to your question within 3 business days of your submission. 

Note that your username and question may be shown publicly. To share your thoughts anonymously, or ask a question about the initiative, please email us at: housingpolicy@vancouver.ca

loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share Will Vancouver adopt single staircase apartments up to 6 storeys like what the Province recently allowed for? The proposed changes to remove rezoning is a great idea by the way! on Facebook Share Will Vancouver adopt single staircase apartments up to 6 storeys like what the Province recently allowed for? The proposed changes to remove rezoning is a great idea by the way! on Twitter Share Will Vancouver adopt single staircase apartments up to 6 storeys like what the Province recently allowed for? The proposed changes to remove rezoning is a great idea by the way! on Linkedin Email Will Vancouver adopt single staircase apartments up to 6 storeys like what the Province recently allowed for? The proposed changes to remove rezoning is a great idea by the way! link

    Will Vancouver adopt single staircase apartments up to 6 storeys like what the Province recently allowed for? The proposed changes to remove rezoning is a great idea by the way!

    MarpoleMania asked 3 days ago

    We are interested in the opportunities single staircase apartment designs have in enabling things like better unit plans, more opportunity for family-sized units and making low-rise apartments work on smaller sites. Work will be required to review fire and safety considerations as potential updates to the Vancouver Building By-law (VBBL) are explored. This work is underway now. 

  • Share Will churches/worship spaces be able to redevelop their properties for social housing and also retain some space for their own operations (worship space, office space, etc)? on Facebook Share Will churches/worship spaces be able to redevelop their properties for social housing and also retain some space for their own operations (worship space, office space, etc)? on Twitter Share Will churches/worship spaces be able to redevelop their properties for social housing and also retain some space for their own operations (worship space, office space, etc)? on Linkedin Email Will churches/worship spaces be able to redevelop their properties for social housing and also retain some space for their own operations (worship space, office space, etc)? link

    Will churches/worship spaces be able to redevelop their properties for social housing and also retain some space for their own operations (worship space, office space, etc)?

    LeslieR asked 4 days ago

    Churches and places of worship that are registered as a non-profit/charity under the Societies Act of British Columbia and have the resources to deliver their replacement worship space alongside the social housing will be eligible to pursue development on their sites under this proposalThere have been precedents in Vancouver where some places of worship have set up a non-profit or partnered with one to pursue non-market housing development with replacement worship space on their site. 

    One of the challenges Churches/Places of worship sites have faced is the high cost of redevelopment where the social housing component does not provide enough rental revenue to support replacement of worship space alongside the housing. As part of this initiative, we are proposing a Rezoning Policy which would allow City Council to review and consider on a case-by-case basis non-profit projects with unique characteristics. This would include places of worship sites which may need a market housing component (e.g. market rental) for the project to be viable and deliver both social housing and replacement workshop space. 

  • Share Which council motions does this respond to? on Facebook Share Which council motions does this respond to? on Twitter Share Which council motions does this respond to? on Linkedin Email Which council motions does this respond to? link

    Which council motions does this respond to?

    asked 6 days ago

    This proposal responds to the following Council Motions: 

    This proposal is also an implementation action of Vancouver Plan, which was approved by Council in July 2022 

  • Share I'm currently renting in one of the proposed areas. My current rent is less than what is noted in the propsal for low income families. So what happens if I am displaced due to this intitiative? Will the renter's protection ensure that I will be provided with a similar unit (size and location) at the same rent if I am displaced? on Facebook Share I'm currently renting in one of the proposed areas. My current rent is less than what is noted in the propsal for low income families. So what happens if I am displaced due to this intitiative? Will the renter's protection ensure that I will be provided with a similar unit (size and location) at the same rent if I am displaced? on Twitter Share I'm currently renting in one of the proposed areas. My current rent is less than what is noted in the propsal for low income families. So what happens if I am displaced due to this intitiative? Will the renter's protection ensure that I will be provided with a similar unit (size and location) at the same rent if I am displaced? on Linkedin Email I'm currently renting in one of the proposed areas. My current rent is less than what is noted in the propsal for low income families. So what happens if I am displaced due to this intitiative? Will the renter's protection ensure that I will be provided with a similar unit (size and location) at the same rent if I am displaced? link

    I'm currently renting in one of the proposed areas. My current rent is less than what is noted in the propsal for low income families. So what happens if I am displaced due to this intitiative? Will the renter's protection ensure that I will be provided with a similar unit (size and location) at the same rent if I am displaced?

    speedrail asked 7 days ago

    Under this proposal only registered non-profits or governments are allowed to pursue redevelopment of existing buildings. If your current building is privately owned then the owners will not be allowed to redevelop under this proposal unless they sell the building to a non-profit or government. 

    If you currently live in a non-profit social housing building, then existing tenants are covered by the Non-Market Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy. Under this policy, applicants must provide a Tenant Relocation Plan that: 

    • Ensures permanent rehousing options that limit disruption to residents 
    • Maintains affordability for existing residents by providing a suitable replacement home that is affordable to them 
    • Provides support with relocation and consideration of special circumstances (e.g. moving expenses, adaptability needs) 
    • Option to return to the new development at rents that are affordable to them 
    • Provides early and ongoing communication and engagement with residents 
  • Share This plan will incentivize densification in many areas already containing below-market, older rental buildings in areas that are <10 blocks away from being covered in the Broadway Plan. Will enhanced tenant protections beyond that included in the TRPP be considered for tenants in these buildings similar to Broadway Plan-area tenants? People with income just outside of the HIL proposed by BC Housing may be unable to afford to return to market housing within the new builds that replace their current housing on Facebook Share This plan will incentivize densification in many areas already containing below-market, older rental buildings in areas that are <10 blocks away from being covered in the Broadway Plan. Will enhanced tenant protections beyond that included in the TRPP be considered for tenants in these buildings similar to Broadway Plan-area tenants? People with income just outside of the HIL proposed by BC Housing may be unable to afford to return to market housing within the new builds that replace their current housing on Twitter Share This plan will incentivize densification in many areas already containing below-market, older rental buildings in areas that are <10 blocks away from being covered in the Broadway Plan. Will enhanced tenant protections beyond that included in the TRPP be considered for tenants in these buildings similar to Broadway Plan-area tenants? People with income just outside of the HIL proposed by BC Housing may be unable to afford to return to market housing within the new builds that replace their current housing on Linkedin Email This plan will incentivize densification in many areas already containing below-market, older rental buildings in areas that are <10 blocks away from being covered in the Broadway Plan. Will enhanced tenant protections beyond that included in the TRPP be considered for tenants in these buildings similar to Broadway Plan-area tenants? People with income just outside of the HIL proposed by BC Housing may be unable to afford to return to market housing within the new builds that replace their current housing link

    This plan will incentivize densification in many areas already containing below-market, older rental buildings in areas that are <10 blocks away from being covered in the Broadway Plan. Will enhanced tenant protections beyond that included in the TRPP be considered for tenants in these buildings similar to Broadway Plan-area tenants? People with income just outside of the HIL proposed by BC Housing may be unable to afford to return to market housing within the new builds that replace their current housing

    Kelsey asked 7 days ago

    Under this proposal only registered non-profits or governments are allowed to pursue redevelopment of existing buildings. If your current building is privately-owned then the owners will not be allowed to redevelop under this proposal unless they sell the building to a non-profit or government. 

    While unlikely, if a market rental building is purchased by a non-profit and proposed for redevelopment for a greater number of social housing units then existing residents will be covered by the Non-Market Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy. The policy focuses on ensuring permanent rehousing options that maintains affordability for existing tenants by providing a suitable replacement home that is affordable to them and provides support with relocation and consideration of special circumstances (e.g. moving expenses, adaptability needs). Tenants whose incomes qualify may have the option to return to the new social housing building if they want to. For more information on protections for residents of non-market housing, please see Section 4 of the Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy. Non-profit redevelopment is different than private market redevelopment in that the project revenue cannot support large payments to existing tenants and so the policy is intended to balance providing an alternate rental unit that existing residents can afford and allowing more social housing units to be built to meet the need in Vancouver. 

  • Share Can a building with as much as 70% market housing in it be considered a social housing building? on Facebook Share Can a building with as much as 70% market housing in it be considered a social housing building? on Twitter Share Can a building with as much as 70% market housing in it be considered a social housing building? on Linkedin Email Can a building with as much as 70% market housing in it be considered a social housing building? link

    Can a building with as much as 70% market housing in it be considered a social housing building?

    HeatherB asked 6 days ago

    No, a building must be owned by a non-profit or government, not the private sector, to qualify as social housing. Please see below for a more fulsome previous answer to this question.  

    Previous answer posted to this question: 

    Under this proposal, all the units in a new building would be secured as social housing via legal agreements, meaning all units are owned by a non-profit or government, not the private sector. At least 30% of these units must be affordable for people with incomes at or below the Housing Income Limits (HILs) set by BC Housing. Often, these affordable units are subsidized by other units in the building renting at the low-end of market.   

    The intent of these requirements is to set a minimum affordability level that allows new social housing to be built. While deeper affordability is always targeted and often achieved with additional senior government funding, the minimum requirements are structured for flexibility to be resilient to changing conditions over time, and to support a variety of non-profit housing models that rely on different levels of senior government funding. Non-profit ownership allows for deeper levels of affordability over time as initial building costs are recovered and the mortgage on the building is paid off. 

    The current Provincial and Federal governments have come to the table with support for new social housing; however, past governments have not always done the same. As we want to enable continuation of new non-profit housing delivery regardless of changes in senior levels of government, a flexible approach is important. 

    Additional context provided below 

    The table below shows the affordability of social and supportive housing projects in Vancouver that are approved, under construction, or completed. Out of 75 projects from 2017 to Q2 2024: 

    • 19% of units have rents at the shelter rates
    • 39% of units have rents at HILs 
    • 42% of units have rents at the low end of the market 


    Table 1. Affordability in Social and Supportive Housing Projects in Vancouver by Development Status, 2017 to Q2 2024.

    Development Status
    # Units Renting at Shelter Rate*
    # Units Renting at HILs Rate**
    # Units Renting at Low End of Market Rates
    Total # Social & Supportive Units
    Completed
    (19 projects)
    5115277351,773
    Under-Construction
    (24 projects)
    4721,0037792,254
    Approved
    (32 projects)
    6761,9122,1384,726
    Total
    (75 projects)
    1,659
    (19%)
    3,442
    (39%)
    3,652
    (42%)
    8,753
    (100%)

    * Shelter rate is the maximum shelter allowance for those on income assistance, set by the Province of British Columbia, e.g. for a single person this amount is $500/month. Read more on the website: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/policies-for-government/bcea-policy-and-procedure-manual/bc-employment-and-assistance-rate-tables/income-assistance-rate-table 
    ** Housing Income Limits (HILs) represent the maximum gross household income for eligibility in many affordable housing programs 

  • Share What does mixed-income mean? on Facebook Share What does mixed-income mean? on Twitter Share What does mixed-income mean? on Linkedin Email What does mixed-income mean? link

    What does mixed-income mean?

    Ian M asked 7 days ago

    Mixed-income” means people with different income levels can live together in the same building. 

  • Share What measures are you considering to protect existing rental buildings? Would these changes put a target on large 3 and 4 storey buildings already run by non-profits? Landfilling buildings from the 1980s in order to build highrises is wasteful and not environmentally sound. These policies might end up incentivizing the demolition of medium density housing stock and the displacement of currently housed residents. The Alma Blackwell building on Adanac is an example of a building set for unnecessary demolition. on Facebook Share What measures are you considering to protect existing rental buildings? Would these changes put a target on large 3 and 4 storey buildings already run by non-profits? Landfilling buildings from the 1980s in order to build highrises is wasteful and not environmentally sound. These policies might end up incentivizing the demolition of medium density housing stock and the displacement of currently housed residents. The Alma Blackwell building on Adanac is an example of a building set for unnecessary demolition. on Twitter Share What measures are you considering to protect existing rental buildings? Would these changes put a target on large 3 and 4 storey buildings already run by non-profits? Landfilling buildings from the 1980s in order to build highrises is wasteful and not environmentally sound. These policies might end up incentivizing the demolition of medium density housing stock and the displacement of currently housed residents. The Alma Blackwell building on Adanac is an example of a building set for unnecessary demolition. on Linkedin Email What measures are you considering to protect existing rental buildings? Would these changes put a target on large 3 and 4 storey buildings already run by non-profits? Landfilling buildings from the 1980s in order to build highrises is wasteful and not environmentally sound. These policies might end up incentivizing the demolition of medium density housing stock and the displacement of currently housed residents. The Alma Blackwell building on Adanac is an example of a building set for unnecessary demolition. link

    What measures are you considering to protect existing rental buildings? Would these changes put a target on large 3 and 4 storey buildings already run by non-profits? Landfilling buildings from the 1980s in order to build highrises is wasteful and not environmentally sound. These policies might end up incentivizing the demolition of medium density housing stock and the displacement of currently housed residents. The Alma Blackwell building on Adanac is an example of a building set for unnecessary demolition.

    MarxistAwakening asked 7 days ago

    Under the proposal, existing low-rise social housing buildingin villages and neighbourhood centres would be eligible to redevelop to provide a greater number of social housing units without a rezoning if they comply with zoning rules. Removing the rezoning process can save cost and reduce 1-2 years to the process of building a new project. However, non-profit redevelopments are still financially challenged, in most cases requiring senior government funding to be viableThis proposal also provides an option to renew and expand existing social housing buildings as they age and/or require significant repairs. 

    Should an existing social housing building be proposed for redevelopment, tenants are protected under the Non-Market Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy, which seeks to balance the need to protect existing non-market housing tenants while recognizing that renewal and expansion of non-market housing is needed to address affordability needs in Vancouver. Under the Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy, existing residents of social housing will be provided with an affordable home suitable to their needs while redevelopment occurs and the right to return to the new building at rents affordable to their household. For more information on protections for residents of non-market housing, please see Section 4 of the Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy 

  • Share It is noted above that this initiative takes direction from the Vancouver Plan. Why is the proposed height limit for Villages consistent with the Vancouver Plan (up to 6 storeys), while Neighbourhood Centres are proposed at heights higher than the Vancouver Plan (up to 12 storeys). L1.6.6. on P. 62 says "Allow for the building heights and densities necessary to deliver rental and social housing while also considering a distributed pattern of growth that allows for smaller towers (~12 storeys) within a block or two of the local shopping street." It appears that social housing was already considered in the 12 storey guideline. on Facebook Share It is noted above that this initiative takes direction from the Vancouver Plan. Why is the proposed height limit for Villages consistent with the Vancouver Plan (up to 6 storeys), while Neighbourhood Centres are proposed at heights higher than the Vancouver Plan (up to 12 storeys). L1.6.6. on P. 62 says "Allow for the building heights and densities necessary to deliver rental and social housing while also considering a distributed pattern of growth that allows for smaller towers (~12 storeys) within a block or two of the local shopping street." It appears that social housing was already considered in the 12 storey guideline. on Twitter Share It is noted above that this initiative takes direction from the Vancouver Plan. Why is the proposed height limit for Villages consistent with the Vancouver Plan (up to 6 storeys), while Neighbourhood Centres are proposed at heights higher than the Vancouver Plan (up to 12 storeys). L1.6.6. on P. 62 says "Allow for the building heights and densities necessary to deliver rental and social housing while also considering a distributed pattern of growth that allows for smaller towers (~12 storeys) within a block or two of the local shopping street." It appears that social housing was already considered in the 12 storey guideline. on Linkedin Email It is noted above that this initiative takes direction from the Vancouver Plan. Why is the proposed height limit for Villages consistent with the Vancouver Plan (up to 6 storeys), while Neighbourhood Centres are proposed at heights higher than the Vancouver Plan (up to 12 storeys). L1.6.6. on P. 62 says "Allow for the building heights and densities necessary to deliver rental and social housing while also considering a distributed pattern of growth that allows for smaller towers (~12 storeys) within a block or two of the local shopping street." It appears that social housing was already considered in the 12 storey guideline. link

    It is noted above that this initiative takes direction from the Vancouver Plan. Why is the proposed height limit for Villages consistent with the Vancouver Plan (up to 6 storeys), while Neighbourhood Centres are proposed at heights higher than the Vancouver Plan (up to 12 storeys). L1.6.6. on P. 62 says "Allow for the building heights and densities necessary to deliver rental and social housing while also considering a distributed pattern of growth that allows for smaller towers (~12 storeys) within a block or two of the local shopping street." It appears that social housing was already considered in the 12 storey guideline.

    604Anon asked 7 days ago

    The Vancouver Plan does provide direction in Neighbourhood Centres generally up to 12 storeys to deliver rental and social housing. However, this was considered in the context of market development i.e. market rental housing and inclusionary social housing built as part of a market condominium building. This proposal seeks to enable 100% social housing buildings which often require additional height/density to help with viability.  

    The Vancouver Plan is intended to provide direction for the next 30 years and so it was anticipated that conditions will change over time and we will need to be responsive. This is why we have noted in the plan (pg. 77 footnote) to consider flexibility in height where equity goals are addressed, such as the delivery of affordable housing. This additional policy direction was considered combined with analysis of recently approved social housing buildings to determine the proposed upper height limits of generally 15 to 18 storeys, depending on individual site context. 

  • Share Why does the plan consider a building with as little as 30% social housing and up to 70% market housing, as "social housing"? We are getting far less social housing than is being represented, so why call it something it is not? on Facebook Share Why does the plan consider a building with as little as 30% social housing and up to 70% market housing, as "social housing"? We are getting far less social housing than is being represented, so why call it something it is not? on Twitter Share Why does the plan consider a building with as little as 30% social housing and up to 70% market housing, as "social housing"? We are getting far less social housing than is being represented, so why call it something it is not? on Linkedin Email Why does the plan consider a building with as little as 30% social housing and up to 70% market housing, as "social housing"? We are getting far less social housing than is being represented, so why call it something it is not? link

    Why does the plan consider a building with as little as 30% social housing and up to 70% market housing, as "social housing"? We are getting far less social housing than is being represented, so why call it something it is not?

    foureyes asked 8 days ago

    Under this proposal, all the units in a new building would be secured as social housing via legal agreements, meaning all units are owned by a non-profit or government, not the private sector. At least 30% of these units must be affordable for people with incomes at or below the Housing Income Limits (HILs) set by BC Housing. Often, these affordable units are subsidized by other units in the building renting at the low-end of market.   

    The intent of these requirements is to set a minimum affordability level that allows new social housing to be built. While deeper affordability is always targeted and often achieved with additional senior government funding, the minimum requirements are structured for flexibility to be resilient to changing conditions over time, and to support a variety of non-profit housing models that rely on different levels of senior government funding. Non-profit ownership allows for deeper levels of affordability over time as initial building costs are recovered and the mortgage on the building is paid off. 

    The current Provincial and Federal governments have come to the table with support for new social housing; however, past governments have not always done the same. As we want to enable continuation of new non-profit housing delivery regardless of changes in senior levels of government, a flexible approach is important. 

    Additional context provided below 

    The table below shows the affordability of social and supportive housing projects in Vancouver that are approved, under construction, or completed. Out of 75 projects from 2017 to Q2 2024: 

    • 19% of units have rents at the shelter rates
    • 39% of units have rents at HILs 
    • 42% of units have rents at the low end of the market 


    Table 1. Affordability in Social and Supportive Housing Projects in Vancouver by Development Status, 2017 to Q2 2024.

    Development Status
    # Units Renting at Shelter Rate*
    # Units Renting at HILs Rate**
    # Units Renting at Low End of Market Rates
    Total # Social & Supportive Units
    Completed
    (19 projects)
    5115277351,773
    Under-Construction
    (24 projects)
    4721,0037792,254
    Approved
    (32 projects)
    6761,9122,1384,726
    Total
    (75 projects)
    1,659
    (19%)
    3,442
    (39%)
    3,652
    (42%)
    8,753
    (100%)

    * Shelter rate is the maximum shelter allowance for those on income assistance, set by the Province of British Columbia, e.g. for a single person this amount is $500/month. Read more on the website: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/policies-for-government/bcea-policy-and-procedure-manual/bc-employment-and-assistance-rate-tables/income-assistance-rate-table 
    ** Housing Income Limits (HILs) represent the maximum gross household income for eligibility in many affordable housing programs 

Page last updated: 25 Sep 2024, 11:44 AM