1780 E Broadway rezoning application

Share 1780 E Broadway rezoning application on Facebook Share 1780 E Broadway rezoning application on Twitter Share 1780 E Broadway rezoning application on Linkedin Email 1780 E Broadway rezoning application link

Revised Application (May 6, 2024)

The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from C3-A (Commercial) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development with three purpose built rental towers at 36, 37 and 43 storeys above a retail base. This proposal includes:

  • 1,044 rental units with 10% of the floor area for below-market rental units;
  • A floor space ratio (FSR) of 8.27;
  • A maximum building height of 135.5 m (444 ft.) with additional height for rooftop amenity space and mechanical appurtenances;
  • Commercial retail space at grade, including a grocery store;
  • Commercial space within the podium levels;
  • Childcare facility (37-spaces) dedicated turnkey to the City;
  • A public plaza running parallel to the SkyTrain station (20,000 sq. ft.) connected to publicly accessible outdoor pace on top of the retail base (12,000 sq. ft.); and
  • 438 vehicle parking spaces and 2,011 bicycle spaces.

This is a revised application from a previous proposal submitted on November 23. 2023. Key changes from the previous version include:

  • Adding four storeys to Tower A;
  • Adding one storey to Towers B and C;
  • Converts one level of office space to residential in Tower A;
  • Increasing the overall proposed density to 8.27 FSR;
  • Increasing the residential unit count to 1044 units; and
  • Includes a dedicated childcare facility (37-spaces).

This application is being considered under the Grandview-Woodland Community Plan. The application requests consideration of height and density in excess of the existing policy.


Frequently Asked Questions:

  1. The heights are described as 36, 37, and 43 storeys above a retail base which is confusing. Can you clarify the proposed building heights?

    The Grandview-Woodland Community Plan notes that “at key anchor points within the site, heights range from 12 to 24 storeys above the retail plinth [base]”. This rezoning application proposes three towers at heights of 36, 37, and 43 storeys above a retail base. Proposed building heights from the ground level are 37, 38 and 44 storeys.

  1. This proposal goes beyond the direction of the Grandview-Woodland Community Plan, why is this application even being considered?

    Rezoning applications that are submitted to the City with all required materials and associated fees must be processed. The rezoning process includes public notification, feedback, presentation to appropriate advisory bodies (i.e. urban design panel), and a full staff review. The review is summarized in a report for City Council that describes the application, summarizes all the feedback, recommends to refer the application to a public hearing and whether to approve or refuse the application. City Council decides on rezoning applications.

    More detail on the rezoning application review process is available here, including information on how to provide input directly to Council after an application has been referred to a public hearing.

Application drawings and statistics on this webpage are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report.


Rezoning Application (November 23, 2023)

The previous rezoning application, submitted on November 23, 2023, consisted of a mixed-use development with three purpose built rental residential towers at 35, 36 and 39-storeys above a retail base. This proposal includes:

  • 981 rental units with 99 units secured at below market rates;
  • A floor area of 77,312 sq. m (832,178.6 sq. ft.);
  • A floor space ratio (FSR) of 7.87;
  • A max. building height of 129.5 m (425 ft.);
  • Commercial retail space at grade, including a grocery store;
  • Office and commercial space within the podium levels;
  • A public plaza running parallel to the SkyTrain station;
  • Publicly accessible outdoor pace on top of the retail base; and
  • 440 vehicle parking spaces and 2006 bicycle spaces.

Please note: This is a new rezoning application for this site. A previous rezoning application had been submitted in June 2019 (revised in 2020 and 2021). This application has since been withdrawn. Link: https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/1780-e-broadway


Comments received to date regarding this application will be considered as part of the staff review.

Revised Application (May 6, 2024)

The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from C3-A (Commercial) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development with three purpose built rental towers at 36, 37 and 43 storeys above a retail base. This proposal includes:

  • 1,044 rental units with 10% of the floor area for below-market rental units;
  • A floor space ratio (FSR) of 8.27;
  • A maximum building height of 135.5 m (444 ft.) with additional height for rooftop amenity space and mechanical appurtenances;
  • Commercial retail space at grade, including a grocery store;
  • Commercial space within the podium levels;
  • Childcare facility (37-spaces) dedicated turnkey to the City;
  • A public plaza running parallel to the SkyTrain station (20,000 sq. ft.) connected to publicly accessible outdoor pace on top of the retail base (12,000 sq. ft.); and
  • 438 vehicle parking spaces and 2,011 bicycle spaces.

This is a revised application from a previous proposal submitted on November 23. 2023. Key changes from the previous version include:

  • Adding four storeys to Tower A;
  • Adding one storey to Towers B and C;
  • Converts one level of office space to residential in Tower A;
  • Increasing the overall proposed density to 8.27 FSR;
  • Increasing the residential unit count to 1044 units; and
  • Includes a dedicated childcare facility (37-spaces).

This application is being considered under the Grandview-Woodland Community Plan. The application requests consideration of height and density in excess of the existing policy.


Frequently Asked Questions:

  1. The heights are described as 36, 37, and 43 storeys above a retail base which is confusing. Can you clarify the proposed building heights?

    The Grandview-Woodland Community Plan notes that “at key anchor points within the site, heights range from 12 to 24 storeys above the retail plinth [base]”. This rezoning application proposes three towers at heights of 36, 37, and 43 storeys above a retail base. Proposed building heights from the ground level are 37, 38 and 44 storeys.

  1. This proposal goes beyond the direction of the Grandview-Woodland Community Plan, why is this application even being considered?

    Rezoning applications that are submitted to the City with all required materials and associated fees must be processed. The rezoning process includes public notification, feedback, presentation to appropriate advisory bodies (i.e. urban design panel), and a full staff review. The review is summarized in a report for City Council that describes the application, summarizes all the feedback, recommends to refer the application to a public hearing and whether to approve or refuse the application. City Council decides on rezoning applications.

    More detail on the rezoning application review process is available here, including information on how to provide input directly to Council after an application has been referred to a public hearing.

Application drawings and statistics on this webpage are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report.


Rezoning Application (November 23, 2023)

The previous rezoning application, submitted on November 23, 2023, consisted of a mixed-use development with three purpose built rental residential towers at 35, 36 and 39-storeys above a retail base. This proposal includes:

  • 981 rental units with 99 units secured at below market rates;
  • A floor area of 77,312 sq. m (832,178.6 sq. ft.);
  • A floor space ratio (FSR) of 7.87;
  • A max. building height of 129.5 m (425 ft.);
  • Commercial retail space at grade, including a grocery store;
  • Office and commercial space within the podium levels;
  • A public plaza running parallel to the SkyTrain station;
  • Publicly accessible outdoor pace on top of the retail base; and
  • 440 vehicle parking spaces and 2006 bicycle spaces.

Please note: This is a new rezoning application for this site. A previous rezoning application had been submitted in June 2019 (revised in 2020 and 2021). This application has since been withdrawn. Link: https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/1780-e-broadway


Comments received to date regarding this application will be considered as part of the staff review.

​The Q&A period has concluded. Thank you for participating.

The opportunity to ask questions through the Q&A is available from June 19 to July 2, 2024.

We post all questions as-is and aim to respond within two business days. Some questions may require coordination with internal departments and additional time may be needed to post a response.

Please note that the comment form will remain open after the Q&A period. The Rezoning Planner can also be contacted directly for any further feedback or questions.

  • Share A representative of the developer stated at the Open House that the upper walk area that is "public" will be closed off in the evenings, after 9 or 10 pm. Could you please require the developer to clearly state these limitations in its application and drawings. on Facebook Share A representative of the developer stated at the Open House that the upper walk area that is "public" will be closed off in the evenings, after 9 or 10 pm. Could you please require the developer to clearly state these limitations in its application and drawings. on Twitter Share A representative of the developer stated at the Open House that the upper walk area that is "public" will be closed off in the evenings, after 9 or 10 pm. Could you please require the developer to clearly state these limitations in its application and drawings. on Linkedin Email A representative of the developer stated at the Open House that the upper walk area that is "public" will be closed off in the evenings, after 9 or 10 pm. Could you please require the developer to clearly state these limitations in its application and drawings. link

    A representative of the developer stated at the Open House that the upper walk area that is "public" will be closed off in the evenings, after 9 or 10 pm. Could you please require the developer to clearly state these limitations in its application and drawings.

    PB WOODWARD asked 19 days ago

    The rezoning application materials submitted illustrate a proposal for a 20,000 sq. ft. public plaza space at ground level running north/south along the eastern edge of the SkyTrain station. The public plaza is physically connected to a publicly accessible “Garden Courtyard” space of approximately 12,000 sq. ft. on the roof of the proposed grocery store (L2). This elevated space is proposed to be accessible via elevators and a feature staircase from the plaza. The submission materials also propose a delineation of public and private space particularly on the retail rooftop / garden courtyard space (L2). The amount of space which is publicly accessible may be subject to expansion, particularly for the garden courtyard, and any potential time restrictions are subject to review. The rezoning review process will be considering the public space proposed.

  • Share What are the City's plans for the proposed open gathering space, to promote and maintain a clean, welcoming area, and from a public safety standpoint, taking into consideration the existing crime and homelessness issues within the community? on Facebook Share What are the City's plans for the proposed open gathering space, to promote and maintain a clean, welcoming area, and from a public safety standpoint, taking into consideration the existing crime and homelessness issues within the community? on Twitter Share What are the City's plans for the proposed open gathering space, to promote and maintain a clean, welcoming area, and from a public safety standpoint, taking into consideration the existing crime and homelessness issues within the community? on Linkedin Email What are the City's plans for the proposed open gathering space, to promote and maintain a clean, welcoming area, and from a public safety standpoint, taking into consideration the existing crime and homelessness issues within the community? link

    What are the City's plans for the proposed open gathering space, to promote and maintain a clean, welcoming area, and from a public safety standpoint, taking into consideration the existing crime and homelessness issues within the community?

    TeeDee asked 18 days ago

    The Grandview-Woodland Community Plan anticipates a new civic plaza at this site that will become a primary gathering and social place. Design of the new plaza is to consider building arrangement to optimize the use of the space, ensure the design supports vibrancy with varied retail spaces, office and residential entrances fronting and overlooking the space. The design should also consider shading/solar access, a range of programming and uses, SkyTrain noise mitigation, accessibility, sight lines and design considerations to address public safety concerns.  

    The rezoning application put forward by the applicant team includes a design rationale for the proposed plaza and other public space. See Section 5.0 of the Application Booklet. This section of the submission booklet discusses potential design and programming in response to the Plan direction. Do note that this application is under review.  At the rezoning stage of the permitting process we review for size, configuration, design of public accessible spaces as part of the overall review. Any approved space would be subject to further design refinement through future permitting stages. This rezoning is subject to Council approval through a public hearing process.

  • Share As of June 26 2024 there has been a change in the City's housing policy regarding 100% rental in Transit Oriented Development spots (Broadway&Commercial). It requires 20% of those rentals be "below-market" if the developer wants to be exempt from Community Amenity Contributions. With 100% rental not considered a CAC, what do you see as the CAC for this proposal? on Facebook Share As of June 26 2024 there has been a change in the City's housing policy regarding 100% rental in Transit Oriented Development spots (Broadway&Commercial). It requires 20% of those rentals be "below-market" if the developer wants to be exempt from Community Amenity Contributions. With 100% rental not considered a CAC, what do you see as the CAC for this proposal? on Twitter Share As of June 26 2024 there has been a change in the City's housing policy regarding 100% rental in Transit Oriented Development spots (Broadway&Commercial). It requires 20% of those rentals be "below-market" if the developer wants to be exempt from Community Amenity Contributions. With 100% rental not considered a CAC, what do you see as the CAC for this proposal? on Linkedin Email As of June 26 2024 there has been a change in the City's housing policy regarding 100% rental in Transit Oriented Development spots (Broadway&Commercial). It requires 20% of those rentals be "below-market" if the developer wants to be exempt from Community Amenity Contributions. With 100% rental not considered a CAC, what do you see as the CAC for this proposal? link

    As of June 26 2024 there has been a change in the City's housing policy regarding 100% rental in Transit Oriented Development spots (Broadway&Commercial). It requires 20% of those rentals be "below-market" if the developer wants to be exempt from Community Amenity Contributions. With 100% rental not considered a CAC, what do you see as the CAC for this proposal?

    PB WOODWARD asked 19 days ago

    The rezoning application proposed at 1780 E Broadway includes 100% of the residential floor area as secured rental housing. The proposal also includes 10% of the residential floor area to be secured at below-market rates. The Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) offer put forward by the applicant team includes a 37-space childcare facility dedicated to the City. The application is under review, including the below-market rental housing component and dedicated childcare facility.

  • Share How is the City going to address the increased congestion/influx of traffic & people with the building of the significantly heightened towers (which also no longer aligns with the original Grandview-Woodland plan), given the current infrastructure in the busiest transit hub in N. America? on Facebook Share How is the City going to address the increased congestion/influx of traffic & people with the building of the significantly heightened towers (which also no longer aligns with the original Grandview-Woodland plan), given the current infrastructure in the busiest transit hub in N. America? on Twitter Share How is the City going to address the increased congestion/influx of traffic & people with the building of the significantly heightened towers (which also no longer aligns with the original Grandview-Woodland plan), given the current infrastructure in the busiest transit hub in N. America? on Linkedin Email How is the City going to address the increased congestion/influx of traffic & people with the building of the significantly heightened towers (which also no longer aligns with the original Grandview-Woodland plan), given the current infrastructure in the busiest transit hub in N. America? link

    How is the City going to address the increased congestion/influx of traffic & people with the building of the significantly heightened towers (which also no longer aligns with the original Grandview-Woodland plan), given the current infrastructure in the busiest transit hub in N. America?

    TeeDee asked 18 days ago

    This rezoning application is under review. Traffic impacts are considered through the review process and can result in the City requiring upgrades to existing infrastructure, including traffic signals and other public realm improvements to mitigate impacts generated from a proposed redevelopment. Proposed developments (if approved) are required to comply with the Parking By-law with respect to off-street vehicle parking spaces. The application also includes a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan which aims to further reduce development demand for vehicle trips and parking and the rezoning site is generally well-situated relative to the frequent transit network, cycling infrastructure, and Skytrain station at Commercial-Broadway to encourage reduced vehicle trips and parking demand.

  • Share Given the nine month Citizens' Assembly, staff involvement, extensive community consultations that went into the Grandview-Woodland Community Plan, how does the City staff think that citizens will not become cynical angry disheartened, disengaged if staff recommends that this proposal - which in almost every respect violates the terms and spirit of that Plan and other city policies - go to a public hearing? on Facebook Share Given the nine month Citizens' Assembly, staff involvement, extensive community consultations that went into the Grandview-Woodland Community Plan, how does the City staff think that citizens will not become cynical angry disheartened, disengaged if staff recommends that this proposal - which in almost every respect violates the terms and spirit of that Plan and other city policies - go to a public hearing? on Twitter Share Given the nine month Citizens' Assembly, staff involvement, extensive community consultations that went into the Grandview-Woodland Community Plan, how does the City staff think that citizens will not become cynical angry disheartened, disengaged if staff recommends that this proposal - which in almost every respect violates the terms and spirit of that Plan and other city policies - go to a public hearing? on Linkedin Email Given the nine month Citizens' Assembly, staff involvement, extensive community consultations that went into the Grandview-Woodland Community Plan, how does the City staff think that citizens will not become cynical angry disheartened, disengaged if staff recommends that this proposal - which in almost every respect violates the terms and spirit of that Plan and other city policies - go to a public hearing? link

    Given the nine month Citizens' Assembly, staff involvement, extensive community consultations that went into the Grandview-Woodland Community Plan, how does the City staff think that citizens will not become cynical angry disheartened, disengaged if staff recommends that this proposal - which in almost every respect violates the terms and spirit of that Plan and other city policies - go to a public hearing?

    PB WOODWARD asked 29 days ago

    Thank you for sharing your concerns. Unfortunately, we cannot speculate on how members of the community may feel in response to policy and application decisions. Each rezoning application submission, received in full with associated fees, made to the City triggers a new and unique review process. No recommendations have been made regarding this application and the review process is ongoing. The rezoning process includes public notification, feedback, presentation to appropriate advisory bodies (i.e. urban design panel), and a full staff review. The review is summarized in a report for City Council that describes the application, summarizes all the feedback, recommends to refer the application to a public hearing and whether to approve or refuse the application. City Council decides on rezoning applications.

  • Share Considering the height and close proximity of the towers, could it cause wind tunnels? Were there any wind simulation done to figure out the potential noise level during windy days? on Facebook Share Considering the height and close proximity of the towers, could it cause wind tunnels? Were there any wind simulation done to figure out the potential noise level during windy days? on Twitter Share Considering the height and close proximity of the towers, could it cause wind tunnels? Were there any wind simulation done to figure out the potential noise level during windy days? on Linkedin Email Considering the height and close proximity of the towers, could it cause wind tunnels? Were there any wind simulation done to figure out the potential noise level during windy days? link

    Considering the height and close proximity of the towers, could it cause wind tunnels? Were there any wind simulation done to figure out the potential noise level during windy days?

    Quentin asked 25 days ago

    The applicant team indicates the following:

    We have looked at the tower placements and given the vegetation and landscaping features acting as windbreakers, reducing the wind speed at ground level, and building features such as balcony projections we don’t foresee this as an issue. Nevertheless, we may be looking at comfort studies as the design progresses and solidifies.

  • Share The Architect boards did not present a sun shadow model for the Towers at different times in December. The locals who live nearby should be honestly aware how much shadow will extend during the sunny winter days. It is misleading to showcase only Sept and Mid March times. on Facebook Share The Architect boards did not present a sun shadow model for the Towers at different times in December. The locals who live nearby should be honestly aware how much shadow will extend during the sunny winter days. It is misleading to showcase only Sept and Mid March times. on Twitter Share The Architect boards did not present a sun shadow model for the Towers at different times in December. The locals who live nearby should be honestly aware how much shadow will extend during the sunny winter days. It is misleading to showcase only Sept and Mid March times. on Linkedin Email The Architect boards did not present a sun shadow model for the Towers at different times in December. The locals who live nearby should be honestly aware how much shadow will extend during the sunny winter days. It is misleading to showcase only Sept and Mid March times. link

    The Architect boards did not present a sun shadow model for the Towers at different times in December. The locals who live nearby should be honestly aware how much shadow will extend during the sunny winter days. It is misleading to showcase only Sept and Mid March times.

    LDbee asked 18 days ago

    December (winter solstice) shadow studies are not required as a part of a rezoning application submission. During the winter months, the duration of the sun light is limited (particularly December) and the weather is also typically overcast and/or raining. As well, shadows cast much longer over winter than during the other three seasons; therefore, the existing built context may already cast shadows onto the surrounding neighbourhood area. Given these circumstances, the long shadow impacts of proposed developments in winter become difficult to assess and our typical shadow assessment of 10am-4pm is less applicable in these cases. For these reasons, standard City policies (and general approach) point to assessing the spring and fall shadows on the equinoxes between 10am and 4pm (and on the summer solstice). These shadow studies have been provided and are being considered in our review.

  • Share We note the developer has provided shadow studies for March June and September. Could you please require the developer to provide shadow studies for December. on Facebook Share We note the developer has provided shadow studies for March June and September. Could you please require the developer to provide shadow studies for December. on Twitter Share We note the developer has provided shadow studies for March June and September. Could you please require the developer to provide shadow studies for December. on Linkedin Email We note the developer has provided shadow studies for March June and September. Could you please require the developer to provide shadow studies for December. link

    We note the developer has provided shadow studies for March June and September. Could you please require the developer to provide shadow studies for December.

    PB WOODWARD asked 19 days ago

    Regarding December (winter solstice) shadow studies, these are not required as a part of a rezoning application submission. During the winter months, the duration of the sun light is limited (particularly December) and the weather is also typically overcast and/or raining. As well, shadows cast much longer over winter than during the other three seasons; therefore, the existing built context may already cast shadows onto the surrounding neighbourhood area. Given these circumstances, the long shadow impacts of proposed developments in winter become difficult to assess and our typical shadow assessment of 10am-4pm is less applicable in these cases. For these reasons, standard City policies (and general approach) point to assessing the spring and fall shadows on the equinoxes between 10am and 4pm (and on the summer solstice). These shadow studies have been provided and are being considered in our review.

  • Share This makes sense to support housing densification in alignment with the Broadway plan. How will the 10% below-market units be regulated? What is considered below market? Will it be below 30% of the the average monthly household income in Vancouver? on Facebook Share This makes sense to support housing densification in alignment with the Broadway plan. How will the 10% below-market units be regulated? What is considered below market? Will it be below 30% of the the average monthly household income in Vancouver? on Twitter Share This makes sense to support housing densification in alignment with the Broadway plan. How will the 10% below-market units be regulated? What is considered below market? Will it be below 30% of the the average monthly household income in Vancouver? on Linkedin Email This makes sense to support housing densification in alignment with the Broadway plan. How will the 10% below-market units be regulated? What is considered below market? Will it be below 30% of the the average monthly household income in Vancouver? link

    This makes sense to support housing densification in alignment with the Broadway plan. How will the 10% below-market units be regulated? What is considered below market? Will it be below 30% of the the average monthly household income in Vancouver?

    AHans asked 26 days ago

    Below Market Rents are regulated through a housing agreement registered on the title of the property that secure, and set criteria for the monitoring of tenure and affordability.  The criteria for defining "below market" rents for this project are specified in the Rezoning Policy for Sustainable Large Developments (SLSP). According to this policy, below-market rental units are to have rents that do not exceed a rate that is 20% less than the average rents by unit type for the City of Vancouver as published by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). However, given the diversity amongst large development sites in Vancouver, staff may consider alternative approaches to below-market rental affordability, where there is clear rationale and evidence that demonstrates an alternative approach is merited. 

    For this rezoning application, the applicant has proposed a package that includes 100% secured rental housing on-site, with 10% designated for below-market rental units priced at 100% of the CMHC city-wide average market rents, along with a 37-space childcare facility to be dedicated to the City. City staff are assessing the proposal and how it meets the policies above as well as other applicable City policies and regulations. The table below provides reference to the 100% City wide average market rents and the average household income served from the most recent CMHC’s Rental Survey (2023). Note that the proposed BMR (at 100% of CMHC) will be more affordable than market rents for newer buildings in the Eastside.   

    Unit

    City Wide Average Rent (CMHC, 2023)²1

    City Wide Average Household Income Served

    Average Market Rent in Newer Buildings – Eastside (CMHC, 2023)²

    Average Household Income Served

    Studio

    $               1,529 

     $                          61,160 

     $                 1,776 

     $           71,040 

    1-bed

    $               1,786 

     $                          71,440 

     $                 2,116 

     $           84,640 

    2-bed

    $               2,461 

     $                          98,440 

     $                 2,839 

     $         113,560 

    3-bed

    $               2,994 

     $                        119,760 

     $                 3,245 

     $         129,800 

    1 and 2 : Data source from CMHC Rental Market Survey October 2023

    Note: Rents are equivalent to 30% of annual incomes divided by 12. Incomes are calculated by multiplying rents by 12 and dividing by 30%.

  • Share All vancouverites respect the interest to reduce car demands, but this concept of approx. 160 parking spots in a tower with 1044 units is unrealistic, as many who will rent and live in these towers will have at 1(one) vehicle per family or renter group. How else can a family take kids to a school sports event or to support family or grandparents? Even if at 75-80%- that would be 750-800extra vehicles - or 600 or 650 cars desperate for nearby parking ("carmageddon"). Will the City or developer reconsider the amount of parking to be supplied by this development, or will the local area be flooded with cars jammed into all 2hr spots or anything unmarked in back alleys? Will those living in this building be excluded from getting parking permit passes for the Broadway area? if not, this will create unfortunate havoc in the surrounding 4 blocks around the Safeway towers. on Facebook Share All vancouverites respect the interest to reduce car demands, but this concept of approx. 160 parking spots in a tower with 1044 units is unrealistic, as many who will rent and live in these towers will have at 1(one) vehicle per family or renter group. How else can a family take kids to a school sports event or to support family or grandparents? Even if at 75-80%- that would be 750-800extra vehicles - or 600 or 650 cars desperate for nearby parking ("carmageddon"). Will the City or developer reconsider the amount of parking to be supplied by this development, or will the local area be flooded with cars jammed into all 2hr spots or anything unmarked in back alleys? Will those living in this building be excluded from getting parking permit passes for the Broadway area? if not, this will create unfortunate havoc in the surrounding 4 blocks around the Safeway towers. on Twitter Share All vancouverites respect the interest to reduce car demands, but this concept of approx. 160 parking spots in a tower with 1044 units is unrealistic, as many who will rent and live in these towers will have at 1(one) vehicle per family or renter group. How else can a family take kids to a school sports event or to support family or grandparents? Even if at 75-80%- that would be 750-800extra vehicles - or 600 or 650 cars desperate for nearby parking ("carmageddon"). Will the City or developer reconsider the amount of parking to be supplied by this development, or will the local area be flooded with cars jammed into all 2hr spots or anything unmarked in back alleys? Will those living in this building be excluded from getting parking permit passes for the Broadway area? if not, this will create unfortunate havoc in the surrounding 4 blocks around the Safeway towers. on Linkedin Email All vancouverites respect the interest to reduce car demands, but this concept of approx. 160 parking spots in a tower with 1044 units is unrealistic, as many who will rent and live in these towers will have at 1(one) vehicle per family or renter group. How else can a family take kids to a school sports event or to support family or grandparents? Even if at 75-80%- that would be 750-800extra vehicles - or 600 or 650 cars desperate for nearby parking ("carmageddon"). Will the City or developer reconsider the amount of parking to be supplied by this development, or will the local area be flooded with cars jammed into all 2hr spots or anything unmarked in back alleys? Will those living in this building be excluded from getting parking permit passes for the Broadway area? if not, this will create unfortunate havoc in the surrounding 4 blocks around the Safeway towers. link

    All vancouverites respect the interest to reduce car demands, but this concept of approx. 160 parking spots in a tower with 1044 units is unrealistic, as many who will rent and live in these towers will have at 1(one) vehicle per family or renter group. How else can a family take kids to a school sports event or to support family or grandparents? Even if at 75-80%- that would be 750-800extra vehicles - or 600 or 650 cars desperate for nearby parking ("carmageddon"). Will the City or developer reconsider the amount of parking to be supplied by this development, or will the local area be flooded with cars jammed into all 2hr spots or anything unmarked in back alleys? Will those living in this building be excluded from getting parking permit passes for the Broadway area? if not, this will create unfortunate havoc in the surrounding 4 blocks around the Safeway towers.

    LDbee asked 18 days ago

    We have received your comments related to parking and they will be considered in our review of the rezoning application. Overall 440 parking spaces are proposed which includes 187 spaces for residential use. More detail on the proposed parking is available on the ShapeYourCity page here. The proposed parking is under review and the standard expectation with any development (if approved) is to comply with the Parking By-law with respect to off-street vehicle parking spaces. Also considered in the review are Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures which aim to further reduce development demand for vehicle trips and parking. The rezoning site is generally well-situated relative to the frequent transit network, cycling infrastructure, and Skytrain station at Commercial-Broadway to encourage reduced vehicle trips and parking demand.

Page last updated: 12 Jul 2024, 01:12 PM