1365 W 12th Ave rezoning application
The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from RM-3 (Residential) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of a 20-storey mixed-use building and includes:
- 116 secured rental units with 20% of the floor area secured for below market rental units (approximately 23 units);
- Commercial space on the ground floor;
- A floor space ratio (FSR) of 6.5; and
- A building height of 66.9 m (222 ft.).
This application is being considered under the Broadway Plan.
Application drawings and statistics on this webpage are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report. Shadow studies were missing from the original application and have now been added to the documents.
July 2024:
Revised drawings have been provided. Key changes include increased rear setback while still maintaining a setback along West 12th Avenue for tree retention, along with revisions to meet the family housing requirements.
Referred to Public Hearing
On November 12, 2024 City Council referred this application to a Public Hearing.
Give feedback to City Council:
or via mail to:
City of Vancouver, City Clerk’s Office
453 West 12th Avenue, Third Floor
Vancouver, BC, V5Y 1V4
Or request to speak, starting approximately one week before the meeting.
Your comments and name will be published in the meeting record.
The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from RM-3 (Residential) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of a 20-storey mixed-use building and includes:
- 116 secured rental units with 20% of the floor area secured for below market rental units (approximately 23 units);
- Commercial space on the ground floor;
- A floor space ratio (FSR) of 6.5; and
- A building height of 66.9 m (222 ft.).
This application is being considered under the Broadway Plan.
Application drawings and statistics on this webpage are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report. Shadow studies were missing from the original application and have now been added to the documents.
July 2024:
Revised drawings have been provided. Key changes include increased rear setback while still maintaining a setback along West 12th Avenue for tree retention, along with revisions to meet the family housing requirements.
Referred to Public Hearing
On November 12, 2024 City Council referred this application to a Public Hearing.
Give feedback to City Council:
or via mail to:
City of Vancouver, City Clerk’s Office
453 West 12th Avenue, Third Floor
Vancouver, BC, V5Y 1V4
Or request to speak, starting approximately one week before the meeting.
Your comments and name will be published in the meeting record.
The opportunity to ask questions through the Q&A is available from March 6, 2024 to March 19, 2024.
We post all questions as-is and aim to respond within two business days. Some questions may require coordination with internal departments and additional time may be needed to post a response.
Please note that the comment form will remain open after the Q&A period. The Rezoning Planner can also be contacted directly for any further feedback or questions.
-
Share You've noted that "shadow studies were missing from the original application and have now been added to the documents". Are you certain that these new shadow studies are correct? Analysis posted online seems to suggest otherwise. on Facebook Share You've noted that "shadow studies were missing from the original application and have now been added to the documents". Are you certain that these new shadow studies are correct? Analysis posted online seems to suggest otherwise. on Twitter Share You've noted that "shadow studies were missing from the original application and have now been added to the documents". Are you certain that these new shadow studies are correct? Analysis posted online seems to suggest otherwise. on Linkedin Email You've noted that "shadow studies were missing from the original application and have now been added to the documents". Are you certain that these new shadow studies are correct? Analysis posted online seems to suggest otherwise. link
You've noted that "shadow studies were missing from the original application and have now been added to the documents". Are you certain that these new shadow studies are correct? Analysis posted online seems to suggest otherwise.
redpanda asked 8 months agoThank you for your question. The Council-approved Broadway Plan requires that overshadowing of new development on pre-determined public open spaces (public parks, high streets, public school grounds, etc.) be mitigated during certain times of the day. Shadow studies are required for all applications to help provide as much information to the general public, staff and Council about a new development as possible. When review of the application materials reveals an inconsistency or inaccuracy, staff will undertake independent studies, including shadow modelling, to verify any errors and inform next steps.
In this case, review of the shadow studies has noted incorrect times used in relation to daylight savings. Additional information is being requested from the applicant and will be posted online when ready.
-
Share 1. What happens to tenants who have pets? The 2019 Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy says “In cases where the tenant previously had a pet under a pet-accommodating tenancy, the tenant shall be offered a pet-friendly unit as part of their Right of First Refusal.” My understanding is the TRPP still applies to everyone in the Broadway Plan area, with the Broadway Plan s. 12.1 “Tenant Stability and Protections” applying in addition to the TRPP. Is the City enforcing this protection for tenants with pets? What about for interim housing while the new building is constructed? 2. Why do the design drawings submitted not show the square footage for the proposed new apartments? Isn't that information important to the City for considering this application.? The existing tenants are entitled to that information before they decide whether they want to return to the new building. When will this information be shared with the tenants and public? 3. The apartments in 1365 W 12, and many of the homes in the Broadway Plan area, are a reasonable, liveable size. What does the City consider an acceptable replacement unit for a single person? For a couple? For 2 roommates? It’s unacceptable if people living in 600-700 sq ft homes are expected to move back into <300 sq ft apartments. 4. What happens if two roommates, currently living together, make different decisions about whether to exercise their Right of First Refusal? 5. What is the possible "punch through to basement of west property" noted on the basement plan on page 34 of the application? 6. For all of these Broadway Plan redevelopments, does the City have any plan to compensate neighbouring tenants who rely on a quiet home office space for their employment during construction? on Facebook Share 1. What happens to tenants who have pets? The 2019 Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy says “In cases where the tenant previously had a pet under a pet-accommodating tenancy, the tenant shall be offered a pet-friendly unit as part of their Right of First Refusal.” My understanding is the TRPP still applies to everyone in the Broadway Plan area, with the Broadway Plan s. 12.1 “Tenant Stability and Protections” applying in addition to the TRPP. Is the City enforcing this protection for tenants with pets? What about for interim housing while the new building is constructed? 2. Why do the design drawings submitted not show the square footage for the proposed new apartments? Isn't that information important to the City for considering this application.? The existing tenants are entitled to that information before they decide whether they want to return to the new building. When will this information be shared with the tenants and public? 3. The apartments in 1365 W 12, and many of the homes in the Broadway Plan area, are a reasonable, liveable size. What does the City consider an acceptable replacement unit for a single person? For a couple? For 2 roommates? It’s unacceptable if people living in 600-700 sq ft homes are expected to move back into <300 sq ft apartments. 4. What happens if two roommates, currently living together, make different decisions about whether to exercise their Right of First Refusal? 5. What is the possible "punch through to basement of west property" noted on the basement plan on page 34 of the application? 6. For all of these Broadway Plan redevelopments, does the City have any plan to compensate neighbouring tenants who rely on a quiet home office space for their employment during construction? on Twitter Share 1. What happens to tenants who have pets? The 2019 Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy says “In cases where the tenant previously had a pet under a pet-accommodating tenancy, the tenant shall be offered a pet-friendly unit as part of their Right of First Refusal.” My understanding is the TRPP still applies to everyone in the Broadway Plan area, with the Broadway Plan s. 12.1 “Tenant Stability and Protections” applying in addition to the TRPP. Is the City enforcing this protection for tenants with pets? What about for interim housing while the new building is constructed? 2. Why do the design drawings submitted not show the square footage for the proposed new apartments? Isn't that information important to the City for considering this application.? The existing tenants are entitled to that information before they decide whether they want to return to the new building. When will this information be shared with the tenants and public? 3. The apartments in 1365 W 12, and many of the homes in the Broadway Plan area, are a reasonable, liveable size. What does the City consider an acceptable replacement unit for a single person? For a couple? For 2 roommates? It’s unacceptable if people living in 600-700 sq ft homes are expected to move back into <300 sq ft apartments. 4. What happens if two roommates, currently living together, make different decisions about whether to exercise their Right of First Refusal? 5. What is the possible "punch through to basement of west property" noted on the basement plan on page 34 of the application? 6. For all of these Broadway Plan redevelopments, does the City have any plan to compensate neighbouring tenants who rely on a quiet home office space for their employment during construction? on Linkedin Email 1. What happens to tenants who have pets? The 2019 Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy says “In cases where the tenant previously had a pet under a pet-accommodating tenancy, the tenant shall be offered a pet-friendly unit as part of their Right of First Refusal.” My understanding is the TRPP still applies to everyone in the Broadway Plan area, with the Broadway Plan s. 12.1 “Tenant Stability and Protections” applying in addition to the TRPP. Is the City enforcing this protection for tenants with pets? What about for interim housing while the new building is constructed? 2. Why do the design drawings submitted not show the square footage for the proposed new apartments? Isn't that information important to the City for considering this application.? The existing tenants are entitled to that information before they decide whether they want to return to the new building. When will this information be shared with the tenants and public? 3. The apartments in 1365 W 12, and many of the homes in the Broadway Plan area, are a reasonable, liveable size. What does the City consider an acceptable replacement unit for a single person? For a couple? For 2 roommates? It’s unacceptable if people living in 600-700 sq ft homes are expected to move back into <300 sq ft apartments. 4. What happens if two roommates, currently living together, make different decisions about whether to exercise their Right of First Refusal? 5. What is the possible "punch through to basement of west property" noted on the basement plan on page 34 of the application? 6. For all of these Broadway Plan redevelopments, does the City have any plan to compensate neighbouring tenants who rely on a quiet home office space for their employment during construction? link
1. What happens to tenants who have pets? The 2019 Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy says “In cases where the tenant previously had a pet under a pet-accommodating tenancy, the tenant shall be offered a pet-friendly unit as part of their Right of First Refusal.” My understanding is the TRPP still applies to everyone in the Broadway Plan area, with the Broadway Plan s. 12.1 “Tenant Stability and Protections” applying in addition to the TRPP. Is the City enforcing this protection for tenants with pets? What about for interim housing while the new building is constructed? 2. Why do the design drawings submitted not show the square footage for the proposed new apartments? Isn't that information important to the City for considering this application.? The existing tenants are entitled to that information before they decide whether they want to return to the new building. When will this information be shared with the tenants and public? 3. The apartments in 1365 W 12, and many of the homes in the Broadway Plan area, are a reasonable, liveable size. What does the City consider an acceptable replacement unit for a single person? For a couple? For 2 roommates? It’s unacceptable if people living in 600-700 sq ft homes are expected to move back into <300 sq ft apartments. 4. What happens if two roommates, currently living together, make different decisions about whether to exercise their Right of First Refusal? 5. What is the possible "punch through to basement of west property" noted on the basement plan on page 34 of the application? 6. For all of these Broadway Plan redevelopments, does the City have any plan to compensate neighbouring tenants who rely on a quiet home office space for their employment during construction?
KWinterbear asked 8 months agoThank you for your questions. A summary of the responses to your questions is below but please contact the rezoning planner via email or phone directly if you wish to discuss in more detail.
- Regarding pets:
- The applicant for this proposal has indicated that the building is intended to be pet friendly. The City’s 2019 Tenant Relocation Plan Policy (TRPP) includes the following language regarding pets: In cases where the tenant previously had a pet under a pet-accommodating tenancy, the tenant shall be offered a pet-friendly unit as part of their Right of First Refusal. This requirement shall be waived if the General Manager of Arts, Culture and Community Services deems the nature of the pet(s) to be unreasonably onerous to accommodate.
- For the Right of First Refusal, while the City does not currently have the jurisdiction to mandate pets being allowed in buildings and the Province currently has no legislation in place (except in the event of the need for a service or guide dog), through the TRPP the City strongly encourages landlords to allow pets into buildings as they are recognized as a key part of many renters’ families.
- For interim housing while the new building is being constructed, tenants should indicate need for a pet friendly unit when completing the Tenant Needs Survey. If assistance finding alternative accommodation has been requested by the tenant, the applicant must provide the tenant with 3 options that best meet their needs as identified in the survey (such as pet friendly accommodation).
- The applicant has submitted revised architectural drawings which include unit sizes for all unit types. Staff will review unit layouts, size and livability when reviewing the application. Final unit layouts and sizes are determined during the Development Permit process. Development Permit drawings are posted on Shape Your City. TRPP eligible tenants that have indicated interested in the Right of First Refusal will be contacted 6 months prior to building occupancy to confirm their interest in returning to the new building, and will have 45 days to respond.
- Regarding unit sizes:
- In the Broadway Plan area, returning tenants will be offered a unit type (one-bedroom, two-bedroom etc.) appropriate to their household as defined by the CMHC National Occupancy Standard. As a rental building, the proposal is required to meet the Family Room: Housing Mix Policy for Rezoning Projects policy which requires that at least 35% of all units to be suitable for families with at least 2 or more bedrooms.
- There are minimum requirements for studio units however the City does not have minimum unit sizes for other types of units, and is trying to balance the need for more housing and allowing for new rental development to be financially viable.
- As part of the City’s TRP policy, there will be a needs assessment survey conducted by the City, and ongoing communication from the applicant to note any specific circumstances and housing needs of tenants, that will be considered for interim housing and for their units in the new building.
- Whilst larger rental units are often typical of older rental stock, newer rental stock often includes large common indoor and outdoor amenity spaces, in-suite laundry, private balconies, modern fittings and appliances and energy efficient power and heating systems. All eligible tenants are offered the Right of First Refusal to return to the new building, but it is up to the tenant to decide whether they wish to return.
- This scenario is currently being reviewed by staff.
- The ‘punch-through’ is typically proposed by the applicant as an option to allow for parkade access to future developments through the site. Upon review of the proposal’s location beside a potential future 6-storey redevelopment to the west, staff do not believe a shared access to the adjacent site would be needed. Both sites have direct access to the lane and therefore a ‘punch through’ or ‘knock out panel’ would not be necessary on the 1365 W 12th Ave proposal.
- TRP Policy, and additional tenant protection policies contained in the Broadway Plan are targeted for tenants directly impacted by displacement due to redevelopment. These policies do not include compensations for tenants in neighbouring buildings during the course of construction. All construction in the City of Vancouver must follow the Noise By-law, which includes limitations on construction hours.
-
Share "The applicant demonstrates that the development reasonably mitigates development limitations on adjacent properties." Your sentence above in response to other people's inquiries is very unfair to other properties in the same block. This development did not meet the 150 ft frontage required by the Broadway plan, and also restricted the development of other properties in the same block. It is very unfair. Why do you still agree, please explain. on Facebook Share "The applicant demonstrates that the development reasonably mitigates development limitations on adjacent properties." Your sentence above in response to other people's inquiries is very unfair to other properties in the same block. This development did not meet the 150 ft frontage required by the Broadway plan, and also restricted the development of other properties in the same block. It is very unfair. Why do you still agree, please explain. on Twitter Share "The applicant demonstrates that the development reasonably mitigates development limitations on adjacent properties." Your sentence above in response to other people's inquiries is very unfair to other properties in the same block. This development did not meet the 150 ft frontage required by the Broadway plan, and also restricted the development of other properties in the same block. It is very unfair. Why do you still agree, please explain. on Linkedin Email "The applicant demonstrates that the development reasonably mitigates development limitations on adjacent properties." Your sentence above in response to other people's inquiries is very unfair to other properties in the same block. This development did not meet the 150 ft frontage required by the Broadway plan, and also restricted the development of other properties in the same block. It is very unfair. Why do you still agree, please explain. link
"The applicant demonstrates that the development reasonably mitigates development limitations on adjacent properties." Your sentence above in response to other people's inquiries is very unfair to other properties in the same block. This development did not meet the 150 ft frontage required by the Broadway plan, and also restricted the development of other properties in the same block. It is very unfair. Why do you still agree, please explain.
Leo Chan asked 8 months agoThank you for your question. When Council approved the Broadway Plan in June 2022, Council made an amendment to the Plan policies to consider tower developments on sites with frontages of less than 150 ft. in certain circumstances at the discretion of the Director of Planning (see Page 70 of the Plan). Proposals on sites with a frontage less than 150 ft. are required to meet the following criteria:
- Have a minimum frontage of 99 ft.;
- Satisfy the Plan’s built form and site design principles; and
- Demonstrate that the development would reasonably mitigate development limitations on adjacent properties.
This Council direction is reflected in the final Broadway Plan as adopted, including for Fairview South Area B where this project is located. For more details on the Council resolution, please see Recommendation I in the meeting minutes.
Compliance with this criteria is being reviewed as part of the rezoning process and design conditions may be applied as part of the report back to Council.
-
Share We object because Broadway plan page 142//500, section 9.10.1 Summary Table has stated that the frontage of a 20-storys, the frontage must be at least 150ft. However, the current property at 1365 W 12th Ave. has a frontage of only 100ft. It does not meet your Broadway Plan requirment. For this reason we oppose this plan. on Facebook Share We object because Broadway plan page 142//500, section 9.10.1 Summary Table has stated that the frontage of a 20-storys, the frontage must be at least 150ft. However, the current property at 1365 W 12th Ave. has a frontage of only 100ft. It does not meet your Broadway Plan requirment. For this reason we oppose this plan. on Twitter Share We object because Broadway plan page 142//500, section 9.10.1 Summary Table has stated that the frontage of a 20-storys, the frontage must be at least 150ft. However, the current property at 1365 W 12th Ave. has a frontage of only 100ft. It does not meet your Broadway Plan requirment. For this reason we oppose this plan. on Linkedin Email We object because Broadway plan page 142//500, section 9.10.1 Summary Table has stated that the frontage of a 20-storys, the frontage must be at least 150ft. However, the current property at 1365 W 12th Ave. has a frontage of only 100ft. It does not meet your Broadway Plan requirment. For this reason we oppose this plan. link
We object because Broadway plan page 142//500, section 9.10.1 Summary Table has stated that the frontage of a 20-storys, the frontage must be at least 150ft. However, the current property at 1365 W 12th Ave. has a frontage of only 100ft. It does not meet your Broadway Plan requirment. For this reason we oppose this plan.
Leo Chan asked 8 months agoThank you for your comments. When Council approved the Broadway Plan in June 2022, Council made an amendment to the Plan policies to consider tower developments on sites with frontages of less than 150 ft. in certain circumstances at the discretion of the Director of Planning (see Page 70 of the Plan). Proposals on sites with a frontage less than 150 ft. are required to meet the following criteria:
- Have a minimum frontage of 99 ft.;
- Satisfy the Plan’s built form and site design principles; and
- Demonstrate that the development would reasonably mitigate development limitations on adjacent properties.
This Council direction is reflected in the final Broadway Plan as adopted, including for Fairview South Area B where this project is located. For more details on the Council resolution, please see Recommendation I in the meeting minutes.
Compliance with this criteria is being reviewed as part of the rezoning process and design conditions may be applied as part of the report back to Council.
-
Share What is the possible "punch through to basement of west property" noted in the basement plan? How does this affect the residents of neighbouring buildings? on Facebook Share What is the possible "punch through to basement of west property" noted in the basement plan? How does this affect the residents of neighbouring buildings? on Twitter Share What is the possible "punch through to basement of west property" noted in the basement plan? How does this affect the residents of neighbouring buildings? on Linkedin Email What is the possible "punch through to basement of west property" noted in the basement plan? How does this affect the residents of neighbouring buildings? link
What is the possible "punch through to basement of west property" noted in the basement plan? How does this affect the residents of neighbouring buildings?
Fairview Andy asked 8 months agoThank you for your question. The ‘punch-through’ is typically proposed by the applicant as an option to allow for parkade access to future developments through the site. Upon review of the proposal’s location beside a potential future 6-storey redevelopment to the west, staff do not believe a shared access to the adjacent site would be needed. Both sites have direct access to the lane and therefore a ‘punch through’ or ‘knock out panel’ would not be necessary on the 1365 W 12th Ave proposal.
-
Share The building plans only contain one central stairwell, but apartment buildings taller than 2 storeys are REQUIRED to have 2 stairwells. How can this project receive a green light with such a clear violation? on Facebook Share The building plans only contain one central stairwell, but apartment buildings taller than 2 storeys are REQUIRED to have 2 stairwells. How can this project receive a green light with such a clear violation? on Twitter Share The building plans only contain one central stairwell, but apartment buildings taller than 2 storeys are REQUIRED to have 2 stairwells. How can this project receive a green light with such a clear violation? on Linkedin Email The building plans only contain one central stairwell, but apartment buildings taller than 2 storeys are REQUIRED to have 2 stairwells. How can this project receive a green light with such a clear violation? link
The building plans only contain one central stairwell, but apartment buildings taller than 2 storeys are REQUIRED to have 2 stairwells. How can this project receive a green light with such a clear violation?
Fairview Andy asked 8 months agoThank you for your question. The proposal has a central scissor stairs, with two exits on two ends, and is thereby considered two sets of stairs. It is a layout typical for towers. The tower will be further reviewed against the Vancouver Building By-Law (VBBL) to confirm building layout and fire safety moving through the development process.
-
Share What is the thinking behind the commercial space offered in this building and other proposed buildings in the area? There is already quite a bit of empty commercial space along Granville St - if businesses can't be successful there with a lot of vehicle and foot traffic, why will they be successful on less busy streets? I would love to have more options for corner stores, coffee shops, and delis in the neighborhood, but it wouldn't feel good to see more commercial space added that just sits empty. on Facebook Share What is the thinking behind the commercial space offered in this building and other proposed buildings in the area? There is already quite a bit of empty commercial space along Granville St - if businesses can't be successful there with a lot of vehicle and foot traffic, why will they be successful on less busy streets? I would love to have more options for corner stores, coffee shops, and delis in the neighborhood, but it wouldn't feel good to see more commercial space added that just sits empty. on Twitter Share What is the thinking behind the commercial space offered in this building and other proposed buildings in the area? There is already quite a bit of empty commercial space along Granville St - if businesses can't be successful there with a lot of vehicle and foot traffic, why will they be successful on less busy streets? I would love to have more options for corner stores, coffee shops, and delis in the neighborhood, but it wouldn't feel good to see more commercial space added that just sits empty. on Linkedin Email What is the thinking behind the commercial space offered in this building and other proposed buildings in the area? There is already quite a bit of empty commercial space along Granville St - if businesses can't be successful there with a lot of vehicle and foot traffic, why will they be successful on less busy streets? I would love to have more options for corner stores, coffee shops, and delis in the neighborhood, but it wouldn't feel good to see more commercial space added that just sits empty. link
What is the thinking behind the commercial space offered in this building and other proposed buildings in the area? There is already quite a bit of empty commercial space along Granville St - if businesses can't be successful there with a lot of vehicle and foot traffic, why will they be successful on less busy streets? I would love to have more options for corner stores, coffee shops, and delis in the neighborhood, but it wouldn't feel good to see more commercial space added that just sits empty.
jjjason asked 9 months agoThank you for your question. The commercial space at the ground floor of this building is meant to be for local-serving retail/service uses for businesses like cafés, local grocery stores, pharmacies and bakeries. One of the goals of the Broadway Plan is to locate more shops and services within primarily residential areas. This will help reduce the need for longer trips for daily needs and create more walkable, complete neighbourhoods. This is to supplement the more City-wide serving uses along Granville Street.
-
Share As affordable housing in the Fairview neighbourhood dwindles with new builds, pushing existing tenants out, will rental prices be controlled so existing tenants can afford to live in the community? How much will rental units go for? on Facebook Share As affordable housing in the Fairview neighbourhood dwindles with new builds, pushing existing tenants out, will rental prices be controlled so existing tenants can afford to live in the community? How much will rental units go for? on Twitter Share As affordable housing in the Fairview neighbourhood dwindles with new builds, pushing existing tenants out, will rental prices be controlled so existing tenants can afford to live in the community? How much will rental units go for? on Linkedin Email As affordable housing in the Fairview neighbourhood dwindles with new builds, pushing existing tenants out, will rental prices be controlled so existing tenants can afford to live in the community? How much will rental units go for? link
As affordable housing in the Fairview neighbourhood dwindles with new builds, pushing existing tenants out, will rental prices be controlled so existing tenants can afford to live in the community? How much will rental units go for?
hbarbero asked 9 months agoThis project is for 100% secured rental housing. 80% of the residential floor area will be rented at market rents (as dictated by the market and selected by the applicant) and 20% will be set at below-market rents (BMR). The rents in the BMR units will be set at a 20% discount to City-wide Average Market Rents (as published annually by CMHC), at the time of occupancy, and when the units turn over, the rents will be reset to the same 20% discount to the City-wide average market rent at that time.
As the site contains existing rental housing, the City’s Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy (TRPP) applies, including the additional tenant protection policies contained in the Broadway Plan. Under the Broadway Plan, existing eligible tenants that wish to return to the new building once complete will be offered the Right of First Refusal to return to the new building at either their existing rent (plus allowable rent increases), or a 20% discount to City-wide average market rents at the time of occupancy, whichever is lower. More information, including the 20% discount to current CMHC Average Market Rents, can be found in the TRPP Bulletin - https://guidelines.vancouver.ca/bulletins/bulletin-rental-tenant-relocation-protection-policy.pdf
-
Share Where will neighbouring residents park during construction? Many residents rely on alley parking nearby the proposed build as city permit parking is very difficult to find in the neighbourhood. on Facebook Share Where will neighbouring residents park during construction? Many residents rely on alley parking nearby the proposed build as city permit parking is very difficult to find in the neighbourhood. on Twitter Share Where will neighbouring residents park during construction? Many residents rely on alley parking nearby the proposed build as city permit parking is very difficult to find in the neighbourhood. on Linkedin Email Where will neighbouring residents park during construction? Many residents rely on alley parking nearby the proposed build as city permit parking is very difficult to find in the neighbourhood. link
Where will neighbouring residents park during construction? Many residents rely on alley parking nearby the proposed build as city permit parking is very difficult to find in the neighbourhood.
hbarbero asked 9 months agoThank you for your question. We understand parking is challenge for many parts of the City. The City is working to encourage greener mode of transportation throughout all areas and reduce the reliance on personal vehicles. Through goals and actions identified in the Transportation 2040 Plan and accelerated through the Climate Emergency Action Plan response, the City continues to see an overall decrease in vehicle trips, by improving access to cycling, transit, and other modes City-wide.
Prior to construction, the site is required to meet with and coordinate construction and street use impacts with our Engineering team. Appropriate permits are required to secure street space and any closures must be permitted in advance with proper traffic management plans approved. Construction street use requests with significant impacts are typically not permitted for long durations, especially if there are multiple projects competing for street use. Closures of the lane are likely to be prohibited, and if permitted, neighbourhood notification would be required in advance.
-
Share There's another rezoning application on the same block at 1354 West 11th Avenue, on a lot that's on the other side of the laneway (RZ-2023-00078). For a chance to provide fullsome feedback, could you please publish the full details related to the rezoning application at 1364 West 11th Avenue? Can the community review both applications in context to each other? on Facebook Share There's another rezoning application on the same block at 1354 West 11th Avenue, on a lot that's on the other side of the laneway (RZ-2023-00078). For a chance to provide fullsome feedback, could you please publish the full details related to the rezoning application at 1364 West 11th Avenue? Can the community review both applications in context to each other? on Twitter Share There's another rezoning application on the same block at 1354 West 11th Avenue, on a lot that's on the other side of the laneway (RZ-2023-00078). For a chance to provide fullsome feedback, could you please publish the full details related to the rezoning application at 1364 West 11th Avenue? Can the community review both applications in context to each other? on Linkedin Email There's another rezoning application on the same block at 1354 West 11th Avenue, on a lot that's on the other side of the laneway (RZ-2023-00078). For a chance to provide fullsome feedback, could you please publish the full details related to the rezoning application at 1364 West 11th Avenue? Can the community review both applications in context to each other? link
There's another rezoning application on the same block at 1354 West 11th Avenue, on a lot that's on the other side of the laneway (RZ-2023-00078). For a chance to provide fullsome feedback, could you please publish the full details related to the rezoning application at 1364 West 11th Avenue? Can the community review both applications in context to each other?
redpanda asked 9 months agoThank you for your question. The application on 1364 W 11th Ave was recently submitted and staff are still reviewing the submission materials for compliance with the Broadway Plan prior to posting online. The application with be posted online and the neighbours will be notified when it is ready for public comment.
Key dates
-
December 19 2022
-
March 06 → March 19 2024
-
November 12 2024
Location
Public hearing
Application documents
Applicable plans and policies
Contact applicant
-
Phone 604-671-5967 Email hsovdi@urbanstrategies.com
Contact us
-
Phone 604-871-6168 Email tess.munro@vancouver.ca